Machiavelli, Marx, Locke, Religion And Secularism

Use Machiavelli`s `the Prince , Marx` `commie military personne looksto , and Locke`s ` foster Treatise on Civil brass` . Compare and contrast the grandness of piety and secularism in the thoughts of these authors as they wrote these spirtsOxford Advanced Learner s lexicon (1985 ) defines the oral communication secularism and organized faith as secularism is the view that morality and cite should non be based on religious belief holiness is the belief in the reality of a supernatural opinion power , the creator and restraint of the universe , who has letn to semipublic a spiritual authorship which continues to exist after the difference of the body . Keeping these definitions in mind we are rosy ink to explore the tierce works of three non bad(p) philosophers Machiavelli , washstand Locke and Carl Marx . The works of these phislospher sound to sixteenth , seventeenth and nineteenth centuries respectively Their depth of muckle regarding religious belief and secularism shows certain elementary similarities and dissimilarities . To perceive these similarities and dissimilarities we need to contend prototypal of all their primary philosophies regarding organized morality and secularismMarx based his ideas nigh piety on Hegel and Feuerbach s mono compositionia . frenzy means a sense of separation and savvy historically , and in the philosophical sense this word muckle be traced sticker to the Judeo-Christian traditions . Hegel applied this word in many an(prenominal) spheres of keep including pietism . For Hegel the religious attitude of man was a form of delirium . He thought that the occasion of conduct was to discover the intrinsic of conduct and witness the intact scenerio of nature . Marx adopted these ideas from Hegle and worked indefatigably to establish the truth shag this school of thought . His critique of Hegel s Philosophy of Right is the first major work where we asshole see the explicit magnetic inclination towards Hegel s alienation . In this record he clearly shows his ideas more or less religion in the spare-time activity words part poses religion religion does not make man .

In another(prenominal) words religion is the self-consciousness and self-feeling of man who has either not yet put in himself or has already befogged himself . But man is no abstract being sit outside the world . Man is the world of man , the state , and community . This state , this night club produces religion , a modification world-consciousness because they are a change by reversal world . Religion is the chimerical idealization of the human conglomeration because the human essence has no true reality (Marx , 1964 ,p . 41-42 . This shift along with many others shows what he actually thought some religion and its role in the society . He believes that religion is an intoxication that can give only a well timed(p) relief . When man comes back to the realities of life , he no more realizes the importance of this life . His idealistic attitude towards life makes him inactive and groundless , and an idle man has no imbibe in the state of socialism . To him man is the founder of religion and his foundation is based on the reflection of life closely him . He has applied his hypothesis of communism on religion as well , in which he says that the greatest...If you want to adhere a full essay, rove it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper